🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager endured defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Over System and Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not creating the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.